If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Peak Rail annual report

Discussion in 'Heritage railways & Centres in the Uk' started by huochemi, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:01 AM.

  1. huochemi

    huochemi Active Member Friend

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,143
    Likes Received:
    307
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    I have started a new thread as I know that the main contributor to the existing thread prefers that it stays free of more controversial matters. The latest annual report of Peak Rail PLC (y/e 31 December 2016) - available at https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/02071143/filing-history makes depressing reading. The management there seems to get into a lot of disputes and it comes across as a rather dysfunctional set-up, reflected in the tiny turnover.
     
    philw2 likes this.
  2. David R

    David R Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    1,215
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    £160,000 - that's one hell of a claim - wht on earth can justify that - have Peak Rail destroyed the loco?

    Also if it comes anywhere near suceeding, once legal costs are added it is a massive sum in relation to turnover and even the balance sheet - lets hope this doesn't turn into another King Edward I type of case

    David R
     
  3. David R

    David R Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    1,215
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  4. Breva

    Breva Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    487
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am a shareholder, so got the printed copy, which has a bit more detail on costs.
    There do appear to be some disputes, not only with the owner of the locomotive mentioned above. I guess it all depends on what was in the hire agreement.
    There is also the use of capitalised labour to reduce expenses, £19k in 2016 and £25k in 2015 and 2014. If you add that back into the P&L the 2016 profit becomes a loss. I don't fully understand the accounting implications of capitalising labour, perhaps someone can shed light on that? The A/R says that 'labour costs incurred that are directly attributable to bringing assets into working condition are capitalised'.
    They also revalued the Buxton site in 2011, which increases the equity.

    On the other hand, they got into Matlock, which is a success, and they are looking into extending to Rowsley, which is why I became a shareholder in the first place.

    Good stuff seems to be happening at Darley Dale - lamp posts, footbridge, station building.
     
  5. Stan loco

    Stan loco New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    21
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    lancashire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    My understanding is that the "claim" is still live. Still within the court system so it is in no ones interest to publically comment about it.
    Perhaps this thread should be removed ?

    Peace
     
    Rosedale likes this.
  6. Big Al

    Big Al Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    10,016
    Likes Received:
    6,081
    Location:
    Hampshire
    As a general rule it is is nobody's interest to have an extended debate about any matter where legal proceedings are, or may be, taking place. So with that thought in mind, could everyone refrain from posting further on this matter?
     
    Rosedale likes this.

Share This Page