If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

82045 The way ahead?

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Kinghambranch, May 24, 2008.

  1. Steve B

    Steve B Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    261
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Agreed - give it a rest please.

    Steve B
     
  2. The Saggin' Dragon

    The Saggin' Dragon Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,278
    Likes Received:
    3,743
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Threads separated.
     
  3. 30854

    30854 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    307
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Point of order Gentlemen (as our female membership will long since have tired of the scent of testosterone pervading too much of this thread drift). The foregoing issues are scarcely unique to preservationists, but descriptive of rather a lot of us blokes generally. If you're partenered, and don't think it applies to you.... ask your other half!

    Please gentlemen.... Handbags down
     
    MellishR, 82045MS and paulhitch like this.
  4. 46137

    46137 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Latin teacher
    Location:
    Chester
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks for nice comments, Gav, and I wish the Group the very best of luck with 45551's boiler: as you know, I'm a supporter, but the old energies are taken up a bit too much with 82045 to do more at present. Re further 82XXX tanks, the reason this hasn't been done is that (a) we're mostly too old and (b) a lot of people are waiting to see how 82045 performs in service. Several other lines have already expressed interest in hiring the loco, so we'll see if anyone wants to pick up the baton once it's been given the chance to show what it can do.

    I don't think finding funding support would be too problematic if it's gone about in the right way, and it needs to be borne in mind that building further examples of the class would be a good deal easier (and cheaper) than starting a new type from scratch, however attractive that might be - and that's a subject you and I have discussed in the past. Our intentions are best summed up by Paul Bennett's slogan "Practical Steam For The 21st Century": wish I'd thought of that one, and I'm supposed to be the Publicity Officer! Have you seen p.113 of the latest issue of SR?
     
    gios, 82045MS, Kinghambranch and 2 others like this.
  5. Gav106

    Gav106 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    520
    Location:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
    Screenshot_20170811-221041.png
    I have indeed! Maybe the magazine saw how much conversation it created here and thought it would be a good subject to discuss!!! Haha. But of course we won't go on about that again filling up this excellent thread, I am one of the guilty parties who was part of that as I am rather opinionated.... Not that anyone would ever have guessed!! I do enjoy debating but never the name calling!

    You do have a point about that economics of already having the patterns etc..... But I'm afraid I would still prefer to see a Fowler 2-6-4t than 82046/47/48/49 haha. And if/when a Fowler tank is completed I would prefer to see another type of loco yet again! That must be the secret spotter in me wishing to tick being behind a certain class off.... But hey if I'm willing to put my hand in my pocket and pay for it what does it matter.

    Good luck with the continuation of 82045, I seriously wish you all the best in the project. You certainly deserve it with the effort your entire team puts in. And when 82045 is completed and you have a bit more free time, maybe 4/5551 will be completed at a very similar time, we can discuss more with another drink!
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  6. Kinghambranch

    Kinghambranch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,307
    Likes Received:
    531
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    White Rose County
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They've pinched my thread title! Well, imitation etc.
     
    MarkinDurham, 82045MS and Gav106 like this.
  7. 46137

    46137 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Latin teacher
    Location:
    Chester
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You know, I agree with you in my heart of hearts, but I don't want to go off thread: Fowler Class 4 tank, Fowler Class 3 tank*, 2P...not to mention Sir William A.Stanier, FRS and large-boilered Claughton no. 6004. I'd better go and take my medication, I suppose...

    *
    I've got a lovely true story about one of these: apparently, 71000 failed at Tring on an Up express one night in the late 50's: the firehole doors had stuck closed and no one could shift them so they had to send an assisting loco from Watford mpd. The only one available was 40001, and it took Duke of Gloucester and thirteen coaches into Euston. Must have been quite a sight! Unfortunately it was in the small hours and so no one was around to take a pic.

    Back to reality now...I look forward to that drink.
     
    Gav106 likes this.
  8. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    792
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Even more fortunately, it was downhill all the way!
     
    andrewshimmin and 5944 like this.
  9. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    787
    Very fortunate, I always understand the 3P prairie tanks were very short winded and disappointing, in either Fowler or Stanier incarnations.
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  10. gios

    gios New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2012
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    121
    One important aspect that is continually overlooked when discussing 'batch' production of 82xxx loco's, or indeed any new builds, is the question of 'the knowledge'. Although most of the BR drawings are available, they are simply inert engineering drawings, the construction procedure, idiosyncrasies, order and new material designations are things that are transitory. The importance of this 'knowledge' should not be underestimated. As in the distant past, it resides in the heads and minds of those involved in the construction process. As 46137 stated above "we're mostly too old"- that's the understated kindness that one expects from a Latin teacher ! It would be useful if there were ever consideration for 'batch production', if it came sooner rather than later, before this knowledge and its implications are lost in the mists of time once again.
     
    std tank and Kinghambranch like this.

Share This Page